1. Home
  2. Cities & Towns
  3. Pittsburgh
photo of Kimberly & Albrecht Powell

Kimberly & Albrecht's Pittsburgh Blog

By Kimberly & Albrecht Powell, About.com Guides to Pittsburgh since 2000

The "Johnstown Flood" Tax

Monday August 27, 2007
Many of you have probably heard of the 1889 Johnstown Flood, one of the worst natural disasters in United States history. What you may not know, however, is that another great flood hit Johnstown in March 1936, a flood that is still taxing Pennsylvania alcohol sales.

Originally created to channel emergency relief funds to victims of the Johnstown Flood, the Johnstown Flood Tax is a 10 percent temporary tax that was placed on the sale of all alcohol in the commonwealth of Pennsylvania. It was only supposed to last a few years to raise the $41 million necessary to rebuild the community - an effort that was achieved by the end of 1942. Nearly 70 years later, that tax is still in place and now stands at 18 percent (before the statewide 6% sales tax is tacked on).

The near $200 million collected annually no longer goes to flood victims, however, instead going into the general fund for lawmakers to use as they see fit. A temporary tax that has overstayed its welcome.

Comments

December 5, 2006 at 9:47 am
(1) Tom Martin says:

I never heard of this tax before today (Dec 5, 2006)- it was referenced in another article — amazing - and we still pay …thieving politicians

April 4, 2007 at 4:26 pm
(2) a beard says:

why isn’t this money used to fix the bridge problem in pa. ????
this needs to be looked into !

April 24, 2007 at 10:43 am
(3) Lee Baron says:

I sent an email to Gov. Rendell a year ago asking when is the Johnstown flood tax going to be taken off the tax books….Received no reply !! I guess I really didn’t expect one from socialist minded politicians.

August 11, 2007 at 1:44 pm
(4) Big Al says:

Keep the tax. Mandate that it be used to help flood victims statewide,not channeled to the General Assembly. The tax generates approximately $220 million per year. Over 71 years, that’s over $15 billion dollars.

August 13, 2007 at 10:57 am
(5) jack bennett says:

also they put a 6% tax on the 18% tax. put the flood tax only on flood situations. even on bridge maintenance.

December 31, 2007 at 4:25 pm
(6) Chris says:

I live in Johnstown, PA and since the flood is pretty well cleaned up this tax should be used to benefit the new plague in Johnstown. It should be used strictly to bring jobs into PA, try to lower the unemployment rates in PA, and help with the thousands of Pennsylvanians without health insurance (Notice I said statewide not just in Johnstown).

February 12, 2008 at 10:19 pm
(7) Kathy O. says:

I just heard about this during a newcast and had to look it up to see what the deal was. Amazing but sadly not surprising. I’m always suspicious of “discretionary” spending, and would like to know exactly what it’s been spent on for the last 60+ years. If it’s not going to be repealed (ha!), it should be acknowledged as a permanent tax and dedicated to something like statewide disaster relief.

May 14, 2008 at 11:50 pm
(8) SueJean says:

This “temporary” tax should be eliminated. The less money Harrisburg politicians receive, the less they can misspend, misuse, and squander.

Leave a Comment

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

Explore Pittsburgh

More from About.com

  1. Home
  2. Cities & Towns
  3. Pittsburgh

©2008 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company.

All rights reserved.