The airwaves have been absolutely full of "attack" ads over the past few days in advance of tomorrow's much discussed Pennsylvania primary election, most from Democratic candidates Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Clinton and Obama are also both busy, of course, claiming that the other candidate is being "too negative." I don't know about you, but what I want to hear about from a candidate is what they are going to do for me, for Pittsburgh, for Pennsylvania, for our country... The problem is, however, that as much as voters may dislike them, negative campaign ads appear to work. Candidates, such as Beverly Purdue, running for the position of governor of North Carolina, take a big risk in their decision not to fight negative with negative.

Do negative ads affect your voting decisions? Do they work, or do they make you want to vote for the other candidate out of frustration? Or do they just make you want to skip out on voting in the primary all together? Click on "comments" below to share your thoughts on negative campaign ads.